Ep 188: Stop Overthinking and Take Action
Executive Coaching, Leadership Training, and Personal Development
AI can process, predict, and perform — but it cannot genuinely feel compassion, commune spiritually, or exercise free will. Dr. Brian Arnold, former world-class athlete turned chaplain and author of Relationship vs. AI, argues that human relationships are not just valuable in the age of AI — they are irreplaceable.
You won’t hear a hospital chaplain say this very often: “I have the best job in this building.”
Dr. Brian Arnold said exactly that to patients during his 11 years serving at a Colorado hospital. Not the doctor. Not the surgeon. The chaplain. His reasoning was simple and devastating in its clarity: “I can’t fix you. I can’t give you a sponge bath. But I can be your friend.”
That’s the thing AI cannot replicate. NOT yet. Maybe not ever.
David recently sat down with Dr. B — former world-class hurdler, leadership consultant, ordained minister, and author — on the show. We set out to talk about staying human in the age of AI. What we actually did was ask a lot of hard questions neither of us could fully answer. That felt right.
Here’s what struck me most from our conversation. Dr. Arnold described visiting patients who were completely alone. Someone far from home. A motorcycle accident in Colorado, family back in Ohio, 30 to 45 days of rehab ahead of them. Nobody coming.
Then there was the patient who had a stroke, could see his phone from across the room, and lay there for over 72 hours before anyone found him.
Can you program a robot to sit with that kind of pain?
Technically, maybe. Companies are already experimenting with AI companions for lonely patients. And Dr. B acknowledged there’s a version of that which helps — something to talk to when there’s no one else. But he drew a hard line at prayer. “Is the robot going to be able to talk to God on our behalf? Probably not.”
I’d push that line even further. Empathy doesn’t live in the rational, analytical part of the brain. Compassion isn’t logical. It’s not a sequence of steps. You can train an AI to imitate the language of empathy — and some do it convincingly. But imitation and experience are NOT the same thing.
A late teacher of mine (through his recorded lectures) — J. Rufus Fears of the University of Oklahoma — put it this way: Information is what you find on the internet. Knowledge is the synthesis of information. Wisdom is the application of knowledge.
We’ve built machines that are extraordinary at information. Genuinely breathtaking. Dr. B made the point that all of us could walk onto the Jeopardy stage with our phones and get every question right. The Jeopardy champion of the 1990s was a hero because they had memorized more than everyone else. That’s almost quaint now.
But synthesis? Wisdom? That’s still on us.
Dr. Arnold’s challenge to every listener — and I’m passing it to you — was this: the next time you use AI, don’t just take the output and run. Ask the harder question underneath it. Not “how do I get promoted?” but “how do I serve others through this?” Not “what’s the fastest path?” but “what’s the wisest one?”
The AI gives you information. You have to bring the wisdom.
Here’s where our conversation got genuinely philosophical — and I mean that in the best way.
Dr. B argued that free will is the one thing humans can give AI parameters around, but never truly hand over. You can program a robot to choose between Option A and Option B. But have you given it the desire to choose? The soul behind the decision?
His reference to Star Trek’s Data was perfect. Data spent entire seasons trying to become human. He never quite got there. Not because he lacked intelligence — he was smarter than everyone on the ship — but because intelligence without feeling is just computation.
My father used to say: just because you can do a thing doesn’t mean you should do a thing. That’s a moral framework. You can’t write that into code without first having it in yourself.
Use AI. It’s not going anywhere, and refusing it won’t make you more human — it’ll just make you less informed.
But bring yourself to it. Your values. Your judgment. Your relationships. The wisdom literature — the Bible, the Bhagavad Gita, the Pali Sutras — was grappling with questions about human purpose and moral living long before the first algorithm existed. That thinking is still available to you.
We encourage you to ask one better question the next time you open a chat window: What would the wise version of me do with this answer?
That’s the question no AI can answer for you.
Dr. Brian Arnold’s book, Relationship vs. AI: How to Stay Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, is available at brianearnold.com. His daily devotional, The Routine, streams live every morning at theroutine.live.
Better Not Perfect. Why Perfectionism Is Holding Your Leadership Back.
Perfectionism sounds like a virtue. It isn’t.
Christy Pretzinger — founder of The Better Leader Project, CEO of WG Content, and author of the forthcoming book Better Not Perfect — said something to David on the show that stopped him cold. She described perfectionism not as a high standard, but as “a shame management strategy.” The logic is devastatingly simple: if you’re perfect, you think the shame won’t come. But it always does. Because perfect is unachievable.
So what are you actually chasing?
Think about that image for a second. A horizon. No matter how fast you run, how hard you work, how many times you polish that rock — you never get any closer to it.
“Better,” Christy says, is different. Better is a direction. You don’t need to reach a fixed point; you just need to keep moving. That reframe alone is worth sitting with.
David scored low on perfectionism during his Saboteur Assessment. He’s more of an experimentalist. He tries things. He lets them fail. But he’s been around enough leaders to know that perfectionism runs rampant in organizational cultures, quietly doing damage that nobody names until it’s too late.
Here’s the part leaders don’t want to hear. A perfectionist boss isn’t raising the bar — they’re crushing it.
Christy put it plainly: perfectionist leaders hold people to impossible standards, and criticism (not feedback) never brings out the best in anyone. What you get instead is fear. Silence. Overthinking. People are preparing for harsh judgment rather than doing their best creative work.
No vulnerability. No innovation. Higher turnover. Unhappier teams.
And the cruel irony? You don’t even get excellence. The creative process is imperfect by design. As Brené Brown has said — and Christy echoed — you cannot get to creativity except through vulnerability. You have to be willing to be wrong. A perfectionist leader makes that impossible.
David discussed how he spent 9 years training and 9,000 sparring rounds to earn his black belt in jiu-jitsu.
You know what that belt actually represents? Failure. Thousands of rounds with people bigger, faster, younger, and stronger than him — and tapping out, over and over again. Nobody gets to excellence without that. A perfectionist could never earn a black belt because they’d never tolerate the process.
Here’s what surprised David most in his conversation with Christy. She said her inner voice was harsher than most of the external criticism she had ever received.
Sound familiar?
We speak to ourselves in ways we would NEVER speak to another person. And yet, we let that voice run unchecked — beating us up for an awkward comment at a dinner party, a dismissive remark in a meeting, a missed target. Christy shared a story about an 80-year-old neighbor who sent an email the morning after a neighborhood dinner, devastated that she had told a long-winded story. Nobody else gave it a second thought. She was still at war with herself.
We never really outgrow it, do we?
The path forward isn’t self-flagellation. It isn’t ignoring mistakes either. It’s what Christy calls pause, anchor, choose.
Simple. Not easy.
When you get triggered — and you will — here’s what Christy teaches:
Christy learned this lesson from her father. She still practices it. Still gets it wrong sometimes. The point is not perfection (there it is again). The point is that you get better at it through practice. Every time you pause rather than react, you become a more skillful leader.
That’s not a motivational poster. That’s a fact.
You cannot learn to walk without falling. You cannot build something meaningful without making mistakes. As John Maxwell wrote in Failing Forward — a book Christy references often — the question isn’t whether you’ll fail. It’s whether you’ll fail forward.
So the next time your team makes a mistake, ask yourself: am I responding as a leader who uses this moment to help people grow? Or am I running a “righteousness racket” — making myself right and everyone else wrong?
Better is always available to you. Perfection never was.
Try the pause today. See what happens.
Christy Pretzinger can be found at christypretzinger.com and on LinkedIn. Keep an eye out for her forthcoming book, Better Not Perfect.
Here’s a provocative question: Is intelligence overrated? Especially when it comes to leadership and fundraising?
David and Margaret have both been noodling about this concept lately — about what happens from trying too hard or overcompensating.
Both have been writing on it from different angles on LinkedIn (see Margaret’s recent post here and David’s article here) and are prepared to answer: intelligence might just be overrated.
Margaret thinks the need to seem smart might be one of the most slippery fundraising traps people fall into.
What it looks like is: the tendency to walk into donor meetings with an all-in approach to appearing smart. These fundraisers lean hard into credentials and analytical expertise, arriving with every metric, statistic and canned story they can remember. They are hoping to impress.
The result, as both hosts agree, is that they show up as much less than their full selves. They turn the meeting into the opposite of connection — and ultimately, the opposite of results.
To be clear, our hosts are NOT suggesting that you dumb down. Rather, they are suggesting that we are much more than only our intelligence.
Many of us are experts at sabotaging connection — especially when we care overly about seeming like the smartest person in the room.
David frames this through the lens of what he calls the “hyper-rational saboteur” from the Positive Intelligence Program — a pattern of over-relying on left-brain, analytical thinking at the expense of warmth, intuition, and emotional intelligence. When combined with the “hyper-achiever” and “stickler” saboteurs, the result is a fundraiser (or leader) who is stiff, scripted, and unable to truly connect.
David believes that there is a paradox here. By trying so hard to look professional, you’re actually being less of a professional — because you’re cutting off much of who you are.
Margaret shares how she long believed she had to choose between being warm and being smart. She believed seeming smart was instead of any other parts of her personality. And she, too, used to believe it was more important.
When she finally stopped suppressing her warmth in professional settings, she became a far more effective fundraiser.
The hosts also explore how this dynamic plays out in leadership more broadly.
When a leader always has to be the smartest person in the room, the impact of overcompensating isn’t great. Often, their team stops contributing. Innovation dies. Brainstorming becomes pointless. Risk-taking disappears.
People start withholding their best thinking because there’s no room for it.
Science backs this up — most decisions are made emotionally and then rationalized. Leaders who ignore the emotional field are working against human nature.
The conversation extends to parenting as well. Margaret shares how she realized she was inadvertently stunting her son’s decision-making ability by always jumping in with answers.
David echoes this, describing how he’s shifted from mentor to coach with his own daughters — resisting the urge to tell them what to do, even when he has an opinion.
One of the skills Margaret and David coach is “clearing” — naming what’s on your mind or sharing an experience so that you can stop thinking about it and become present. This can include, in leadership or a fundraising meeting, giving an honest, human answer when someone asks how you’re doing. Even a small, genuine moment of vulnerability, such as “I’m a little wobbly today because…”, can open up the relational space enormously. It can really invite the other person in — in a way that caring only about intelligence won’t do.
A second way to move from only seeming smart to including more authenticity is this a simple exercise: think about how your close friends would describe you when you’re relaxed and fully yourself. When you’re unscripted and engaged. Pick one of those qualities — funny, warm, curious, enthusiastic — and consciously bring it into your next meeting or conversation. Let that be the volume you turn up, rather than the need to impress.
If you are interested in learning more about The BEING of a MEGA Gifts Fundraiser course mentioned in the podcast, you can learn more here.
As David puts it, it’s an invitation to unmask. And for the hyper-achievers listening? Consider this your challenge: if you really want to achieve more, try showing up as more of yourself.
I Had a Really Successful Career, But I was Miserable.
Have you ever looked at your impressive resume, noted your promotions and salary bumps, and felt an overwhelming sense of emptiness? You did everything right. You climbed the corporate ladder, hit your milestones, and made your family proud. Yet, you wake up feeling utterly drained.
Recently, David and Margaret had a conversation with Jennifer Doty, a former Fortune 100 Vice President, speaker, and author. Her story resonates deeply with many of the leaders we coach. For nearly two decades, Jennifer navigated the corporate world, taking on 19 different roles at MetLife. To an outside observer, she was the picture of corporate success. Inside, she was battling high anxiety, poor sleep, and a heavy reliance on coffee just to get through the day.
How does someone so successful end up feeling so miserable? The answer often lies in understanding the difference between what we are good at and what actually brings us joy.
In leadership development, we often talk about different zones of work. The “Zone of Incompetence” is easy to avoid. The “Zone of Competence” is where you can do the work, but it hardly excites you. The real danger lies in the “Zone of Excellence.”
This is the space where you are highly skilled. You receive praise, promotions, and financial rewards. For Jennifer, this was a 20-year career built on being incredibly competent at solving other people’s problems. She was promoted not necessarily because a role aligned with her passions, but because she was highly capable and eager to please.
Many of us adopt the values of our families or mentors without examining them. We seek roles that sound impressive at cocktail parties or provide financial safety. We become experts at making everyone around us happy, finding our self-worth in their approval.
But have you ever stopped to ask yourself what you actually want? For a chronic people-pleaser, this question feels completely foreign. We convince ourselves that we do not deserve to want anything beyond the safety of our current success. We put “lipstick on the pig,” as Jennifer noted, and go to work every day, slowly burning out in our zone of excellence.
Your “Zone of Genius” is the intersection of what you are exceptionally good at and what intrinsically motivates you. It gives you energy rather than depleting it.
Transitioning from excellence to genius requires a leap of faith. For Jennifer, that leap came disguised as a setback when her corporate job was eliminated in 2020. This disruption forced her to pause, build a LinkedIn network, and eventually discover her true voice. She began writing about the unspoken realities of leadership, a focus that led to her first book, Just Lead.
She learned to listen to her gut rather than just her head. By defining exactly how she wanted to feel and the type of people she wanted to work with, she transformed her professional life.
We are often taught that a career is a single track: you get a job, you stay there, and eventually, you retire. But what if you could build a portfolio career instead?
Today, Jennifer embraces multiple roles that feed different parts of her soul. She serves as a VP at a technology startup, helping group insurance carriers thrive. She runs a successful health and supplementation business that aligns with her personal wellness journey. And, perhaps most surprisingly, she is the lead singer of a classic rock cover band called Primrose Path.
Singing rock music on stage might seem disconnected from corporate leadership, but it requires reading a room, thinking on your feet, and managing group dynamics. More importantly, it fills her tank and brings her immense joy. You do not have to abandon your corporate skills to find happiness; you simply need to apply them in ways that support your true genius.
If you are feeling stuck in your own zone of excellence, you do not need to quit your job tomorrow. But you do need to start shifting your mindset.
Jennifer shared a simple, nightly practice that helped her rebuild her perspective. Keep a notebook by your bed. Before you go to sleep, write down:
This small routine quiets the inner critic that insists you did not accomplish enough. It forces you to acknowledge your progress, cultivate gratitude, and set intentional priorities.
You deserve to inhabit a career that lights you up. Give yourself permission to imagine what that looks like, and take the first small step toward your zone of genius today.
Ever wish you were better at processing grudges and releasing resentments?
This episode is for anyone who has ever found yourself replaying an old wound years — or even decades — after it happened.
In this heartfelt and deeply personal episode, Margaret and David take a look into what happens when we hold onto grudges — and how we can learn to truly let them go.
The conversation kicks off with an honest exploration of how unresolved pain from past experiences quietly — and insidiously — shapes the way we show up in our relationships, at home and at work.
David opens up about harboring resentment toward a colleagues, while Margaret shares a vivid memory of being humiliated and abandoned at a high school dance. She found herself still carrying that resentment years later when their paths crossed again.
Sound familiar? Many of us have been surprised by how long an old hurt can linger.
The duo explore the hidden costs of carrying grudges: the emotional space they consume, the hypervigilance they create, and the way they cause us to filter future interactions through the lens of past pain.
Our hosts make an important distinction between anger and hurt. Sometimes we walk away from an conflict or difficult experience with anger. Margaret reflects back to her high school dance memory, and recalled how her anger can feel “righteous” and even empowering in the moment. Anger can cover the deeper feelings underneath — humiliation, embarrassment, sadness — which can be more complex and harder to sit with.
Other times, we are in relationships where we have felt injured and hurt — and that’s what we carry with us.
Both hurt and anger can lead us to carry heavy burdens of resentment.
At the heart of letting go, of processing grudges and releasing resentments, lives forgiveness. David and Margaret talk about what forgiveness actually means and, crucially, what it doesn’t mean.
Forgiveness is not about absolving the other person or waiting for an apology that may never come. It is not about forgiving another person directly, forgetting what happened, or acquitting others of their missteps or impact.
Rather, forgiveness of another person is an internal process — one that you do entirely for yourself. It is a choice to release the negative charge and feelings that you are carrying about another person or interaction.
David draws on Jesus’s teaching about forgiving “seventy times seven.” In other words, genuine forgiveness can take many repetitions before it fully takes hold.
Sometimes, the work of forgiveness involves forgiving yourself, too — because often, as Margaret points out, our resentment toward others is rooted in anger at ourselves for not speaking up or setting a boundary when it mattered.
David shares his own experience of working through a particularly painful incident of professional sabotage. With coaching, he learned he could process his grudge against his colleague without losing his healthy instinct to protect himself going forward. He still understood not to trust that person in the same way again, but releasing the resentment made him feel lighter.
The episode closes with a step-by-step forgiveness journaling practice that listeners can use on their own.
The process involves:
Margaret and David also suggest pairing the practice with physical release techniques — like shaking it out or burning what you’ve written — to help the body let go alongside the mind.
Whether you’re carrying a fresh wound or one that’s been with you for years, this episode offers both compassionate perspective and real tools to help you move forward. If you need extra support working through the forgiveness process, Margaret and David warmly invite you to reach out.
Can you actually sharpen intuition, or is it something you’re simply born with (or without)?
Margaret and I explored that question on the Show recently, and we kept coming back to this: intuition isn’t magic. It’s a muscle.
Have you ever walked into a room and instantly felt the tension? Or perhaps you’ve looked at a perfectly logical business decision and felt a quiet, nagging urge to walk away?
Many organizational professionals rely heavily on rational, analytical thinking to advance their careers. We are trained by the educational-industrial complex to analyze data, build spreadsheets, and deduce outcomes. Yet, Albert Einstein reportedly noted that the rational mind is a faithful servant, while the intuitive mind is a sacred gift. As leaders striving for continuous self-improvement, how often do we actually unpack that gift?
Some people believe you are either born with intuition or you aren’t. Margaret and David tend to disagree. Margaret shared that intuition may be a biological imperative for survival; early humans needed an unspoken sense of danger to avoid predators. We all possess this circuitry.
For some, childhood environments honed this “sixth sense” early on. Reading the “barometric pressure” of a room became second nature. For others, years of business schooling and corporate training overshadowed this innate capability. Make no mistake: the circuitry is still there, waiting to be reactivated.
Intuition isn’t about predicting the future with a crystal ball. It is simply the ability to know something without deductive reasoning. We often expect intuition to be a loud command to take action, similar to how Steve Jobs famously trusted his gut to push technological boundaries.
However, your intuition might show up as a gentle nudge not to do something. You might have an inexplicable urge to decline a project or hold back a comment during a tense meeting. It can also manifest as empathy. Neuroscience shows that mirror neurons light up in our brains when we observe others, allowing us to physically feel their emotions. This emotional intelligence is essential for managing modern diverse teams.
How do we transform our career paths by sharpening this specific skill? The answer lies in conscious practice.
If you currently doubt your intuitive abilities, give yourself permission to simply notice your bodily sensations. Does your stomach tighten before a specific conversation? Start listening to those physical cues.
If you already feel connected to your intuition, practice naming it. When you sense a shift in your team’s energy, put words to it. Blurt it out in the space and take responsibility for the conversation that follows. As you advance your skills, invite your team to bring their own intuitive hits to the table. By blending rational analysis with intuitive wisdom, you will unlock your leadership potential in ways a spreadsheet never could.
Margaret and David visit with Danny Bobrow about Persuasion without Pressure.
Have you ever found yourself talking to your team, convinced your brilliant solution was exactly what they needed, only to see their eyes glaze over?
That phenomenon is what Danny calls “expert override.” As the creator of the Persuasion Blueprint, Danny holds dual MBAs from the University of Chicago and KUL in Belgium. He is also an ultra-endurance athlete and mountaineer who understands that reaching the summit requires teamwork, not brute force. He’s also the founder of Climb for a Cause, a nonprofit that offers individuals and organizations a unique opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to “giving back,” that is, to share the fruits of their success with those less fortunate.
In this episode, Danny shares insights into how leaders can transform everyday conversations into engines of connection and collaboration.
True persuasion is not about convincing someone to abandon their beliefs. It is about engaging people to take desirable action without coercion. To achieve this, Danny outlines three essential, sequential steps.
We often assume our teams know we care about their success. But there is frequently a massive divide between our intentions and how we are actually perceived by our counterparts. Danny calls this the “care gap.”
Minimizing this gap requires high emotional intelligence. It means embracing empathy and matching the other person’s energy. Throwing blind, cheerleader-style enthusiasm at a quiet, concerned employee will only alienate them. When you align your passion with what actually matters to your counterpart, you lay the foundation for genuine trust.
How many questions do you ask before you actually know where to take a conversation? Earning trust and establishing credibility requires mastering the art of the question.
Danny coaches individuals and organizations on a concept called the Persuasion Blueprint. The strategy involves gaining gentle control of a conversation early on by asking the right open-ended questions, thereby establishing rapport and demonstrating empathy. Once that baseline of comfort is set, you can shift to closed-ended questions to unearth the deeper, emotional drivers behind a person’s behavior.
The final pillar of the blueprint is where you bring your counterpart to your side of the table. When people participate in crafting a solution, they take ownership of it. They become committed to the outcome.
This is where you must actively resist expert override. Slow down. Give your colleague, donor, or client the space to articulate their thoughts, even if you have heard the same feedback a thousand times before. Treating a leadership moment as a dialogue rather than a TED Talk ensures that your team feels valued and invested in the path forward.
Are your conversations building trust, or are they silently breaking it? We all have blind spots in our communication styles, and acknowledging them is the first step toward meaningful career advancement.
If you are ready to evaluate your own approach, you can take Danny’s Persuasion Scorecard. It is a complimentary, five-minute assessment that will help you identify your strengths and uncover areas for personal growth.
Transform your communication style today, and watch your team’s performance follow suit.
In this episode of Leadership Deep Dive, hosts Margaret and David explore recovering from disappointment. Feeling dissapointment is a universal yet often avoided experience.
So, how might we more skillfully navigating the sting of disappointment?
David’s own recent “splat” sparked the conversation. This took the form of a significant setback while self-publishing the audiobook version of his latest book, Life Lessons from Memorable Movies. He invested dozens of hours reformatting his content, navigating technical requirements, and using AI tools to generate narration. (He chose this tool to accommodate his dyslexia, which makies reading aloud difficult.)
Finally, David submitted the project—only to have every single audio file rejected.
The result? The “splat” of complete and deflating disappointment.
From there, Margaret and David unpack the emotional layers that follow disappointment.
David shares how his initial reaction included frustration, self-criticism, and a sense of loss. He wasted a lot of time and effort, but his sense of loss also included not getting to experience the relief and sense of accomplishment he anticipated.
He felt ready to be finished with this project.
Margaret highlights a different but equally common response pattern. Many people simply bypass disappointment altogether by quickly moving on or minimizing the impact. She calls this the “There are other fish in the sea!” approach.
They agree on this critical insight: disappointment must be felt to be processed.
Whether it shows up as anger, grief, avoidance or deflation, allowing space for the emotions is a necessary step toward recovery.
Margaret shares a personal story about coaching her son through a law school rejection, encouraging him to fully experience the disappointment rather than suppress it.
This act of “sitting with the sting” becomes a powerful turning point.
David then introduces the concept of the “sage perspective,” drawn from Positive Intelligence coaching.
This mindset looks for gifts and opportunities within challenges. While he this perspective doesn’t erase the pain, it often helps shorten the recovery time and opens the door to new possibilities.
And in this case, a surprising opportunity emerged for David. While sharing his frustration with his wife, David asked her to read a chapter aloud. He quickly realized that her natural storytelling ability could be the perfect solution.
What began as a failed solo effort transformed into a collaborative project.
The episode ultimately reframes failure not as an endpoint, but as part of a multi-step process: feel the disappointment, allow the grief, and then remain open to what other possibilities, learning or gifts might emerge.
The “heat” of disappointment fades when it’s fully processed. Then there is space for clarity, creativity, and even unexpected outcomes.
Listeners will walk away with a deeper understanding of how to navigate setbacks with honesty and resilience—and perhaps a new appreciation for what can happen after the splat.